By answering who created HIM, would be a good start. Don’t you think?

By answering who created HIM, would be a good start. Don’t you think?
Vj ~ A good start for whom? To begin with, atheists do not believe there is a Creator and His answer will only raise the same question of another Creator and another. So where will it end?

Actually it is an excellent question which led me to the answer. Since there is no end there can be no beginning also, so it leads to the word ETERNAL. I figure that the since word exists in both our dictionaries it must have some useful meaning rather than it only applying to an id-i-ot asking the question for all ETERNITY.
So for then, I accept it as an absolute cause instead and moved on to strenuous study and practice to confirm it.

The absolute is the end of all philosophical discussions and only the wise are in possession of it. The feeble minds seem to have the time to fly back and forth with questions, but only a selected few have the desire to make the effort through continuous study and practice to make it (truth) a reality.
I too, at one time was asking for evidence and now that I have found it, I find that it is only useful to me. Why? The mind in the feeble state is too weak to grasp any of it. So I am not here to tell you what is the truth, I am here to tell how to get to the truth and the rest is up to you.
A hero should have been one who saves a soul but in today's world of dense ignorance a hero is deemed one who saves a life.

It ends in a fact that the concept of first cause is a fallacy, because first cause needs a first cause as well. If a first cause can be self-subsisting, why can't the world we live be self-subsisting.

It ends in a fact that the concept of first cause is a fallacy,....
Vj ~ It is a fallacy in your opinion and your opinion is simply crap to me. As I said before, there is no short cut in arriving at the truth, you will have to go the distance as the I did.

And then, coming to a word that exists in many dictionaries, GHOST exists in almost in every dictionary, but never to be found anywhere else apart from lexicons.

I must add that it is very unscientific and irrational to accept something and then work strenuously to find what you have already accepted, because that gives way to prejudice, where you work very hard only on those ideas that you find complementing your accepted views and rejecting those that oppose yours.

And, in response to your "foolish atheist" remark, atheists just do not connect to every word they know,....