“The theory of evolution is widely accepted as false …”

No, it’s not. The debate has been settled, in scientific circles, for over a century - in favor of evolution.

“…because there are still monkeys that haven't turned into humans.”

More on Quora

And now the question is, what do “the relevant scientists” know of the laws of nature?

The ruder stage
"But there is another prejudice which is cherished by many scholars evidently under the impression of its being a well-recognized scientific doctrine. It is that in the ruder stages of civilization, when the laws of nature are little known and but little understood, when mankind has not enough of the experience of the world, strict methods of correct reasoning are very seldom observed." Swami Dayanand

Albert Einstein agrees - "We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws." Scholars of theology, except the Aryas, have no understanding at all and for those of science, it is dim.

Comment deleted on Quora September 19, 2023

“And now the question is, what do “the relevant scientists” know of the laws of nature?”

For a start, they know that evolution is an observed fact … something that you seem to be woefully unaware of.

An observed fact is when the event is steady. That’s how Natural Laws work. We see clouds and know its going to rain, we see a pregnant woman we know she is going to have a child, we see an apple falling it reminds us of gravity. What is not steady, is a human evolving from a ape.

"It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows." Epictus

“An observed fact is when the event is steady.”

No. Observed fact means that we observed it.

“What is not steady, is a human evolving from a ape.”

Of course not. That was a one-time event. And by the way, we are apes.

What is steady is evolution. It just doesn’t tend to repeat itself. We’ll continue evolving, but it’s hard to predict what exactly how exactly we are going to evolve.

“That was a one-time event.”

So it was for the resurrection of the dead & virgin birth, both a one-time event. Why don’t you accept it?

You can pretend to be as intelligent as you want to be, but the question is, what do you understand of natural laws?

“So it was for the resurrection of the dead & virgin birth. Why don’t you accept it?”

No good evidence.

“what do you understand of Natural Laws?”

I briefly checked the website … and it looks very bogus to me. For a start, the mention of “creation” makes it sound religious, rather than scientific. There is no good evidence for “creation”.

All my comments are being deleted by Quora. It seems their mission is to protect stupidity.

"Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education." Bertrand Russell

As Mark Twain figured it out to be - "I was educated once - it took me years to get over it." So have I.

So what’s your point, with these quotes?

The point is, the stupid don’t know they are stupid.

If don't think you are, then explain this - "Science without religion is lame;... Albert Einstein"