WELCOME TO CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM



The power of perfect reasoning is essential to know.


The one true religion

A discriminating intellect is that in which knowledge based only on words, real knowledge and ordinary knowledge based on sense perception or reasoning are present in a mixed state and the mind alternates between them.

"When the time of destruction is at hand the intellect becomes perverted." Vridha Chan. 16:17.
Topic of discussion
Five Tests of true religion - Feb 08, 2002
  1. It (revelation) must exist in its entirety from the very beginning of creation for all of mankind, and not over a long period of time after.
    Oppose - It is unjust of Yahwe, Allah and Christ, to deprive millions born before the revelation of the Ten Commandments, the Q'uran, and the New Testament of His 'divine wisdom'. An injustice which cannot be the work of a Just, Compassionate and Merciful God.
  2. It must conform with (immutable) Natural laws
  3. Oppose - The cause of the physical body is the reproductive element - any other method as man was created from dust or blood-clot and all other miracles of God and Prophets are a breach to this law.
  4. It must be in harmony with reasoning.
    Oppose - Incest which results in mental and physical infirmities, is an immoral action and it had to be the same also in the beginning (creation of one man and one woman).
  5. It must be in harmony with science.
    Oppose - Modern science has proven creation to be more than 6,000 years old, the earth is spherical and it rotates and revolves, contradictions to the Torah, Bible and Q'uran.
  6. Its truth must be confirmed by four evidences :-
  • Direct Cognition - Not all that is known by perception can be true.
  • Inferences - God is eternal therefore we can infer that there were past creations and as well as there will be future ones.
  • Testimony - The testimonies of Rishis, sages and seers of the Vedas (altruistic teachers are all in harmony with each other.
  • History - There are many books (Mahabharata, Valmiki's Ramayan) and source of other civilization which speak of the past ancient Vedic (Aryas) civilization of 5,000 years ago and earlier.

Let's be reasonable when it comes the most abstruse science of God (wisdom), the ignorant (by repenting) and the wise (by austerity) can never reap the same rewards.


WARNING! Reader's discretion is advised - the truth offends!
Past dialogues debunking Religion
Other discussion boards:-  Can a fool, fool God?    Do all paths lead to God?   Debunking evolution
Guestbook
​​​​​​​
The one true religion
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth." Plato
​​​​​​​
Welcome to constructive criticism
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
On Twitter

Vijai Singh
@vjsn
·
Aug 3
"Science without religion is lame..." Einstein
This genius has discovered a higher authority that scientists can embrace to make this world a better place for humanity, but because of prejudice & pedantry, the best gift of God has become a veritable curse.

Dennis
@ArtRobson1
·
Aug 9
His "religion" was, of course, "the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.”

He clearly did not mean what you are implying.

Vijai Singh
@vjsn
·
Aug 10
So why would he admit science to be lame and how would you know what I'm implying when you've no knowledge of the religion he is referring to?
Here practice some impartiality by surppressing your ego

Dennis
@ArtRobson1
·
Aug 10
If you can't figure out what he means, you're not trying.

Feel free to explain the need to be "impartial" when choosing between reason & rank superstition.

If my ego gets in the way, let me know. I'm sure you're an expert! Baby bottle
Vijai Singh
@vjsn
·
Aug 10
Yet I'm able to say he came to know of natural laws because of it unless you know better.

Be impartial, feel free to highlight any "rank superstition" bothering you -


My expertise tells me it is more than ego. Prejudice and pedantry come to mind.
Dennis
@ArtRobson1
Replying to
@vjsn
"he came to know of natural laws because of it"

Because of WHAT? Why do you delight in being so obscure?

Your "expertise" appears to be quoting vague truisms repeatedly as if they somehow support some unstated "one religion" you've "found."

Clarity is not your friend.
2:32 PM · Aug 10, 2021·Twitter Web App


Vijai Singh
@vjsn
·
21h
Replying to
@ArtRobson1
"In studying the systems of philosophy, it is necessary that the mind adopt a discipline of impartiality and sobriety." Swami Dayanand

It seems you've no interest in doing any investigation into this philosophy. So why go on?


Dennis
@ArtRobson1
·
21h
Into WHAT philosophy?!

Another generic quote from Intro to Philosophy?!

"We must do well." - Me

Should we investigate my "philosophy"?

Vijai Singh
@vjsn
·
21h
"Society has become so fake that the truth actually bothers people." J. Phonex